Archive for Random

Follower Ratio Idiocy Will Kill Twitter

// July 26th, 2010 // No Comments » // Random Thoughts

want_more_followersYeah, maybe I’m stating that title a little strongly.  Maybe so.  But if it doesn’t kill Twitter, it is certainly going to decrease it’s value to the social web world.  This much I am sure of.

If you’ve been happily living unaware of what a “follower ratio” is, allow me to briefly explain.  Many people in the twitterverse these days proclaim that if your ratio of people following you vs. people you are following is really far apart then this says some bad things about you.  At the very least, it’s bad form, bad manners, and communicates that you do not care about listening to others and only care about others listening to you.  You are a broadcaster, not a social media participant.  You are an irresponsible netizen.

Hogwash.

This is precisely the reason why your list of “friends” on Facebook means nothing now.  This is why Facebook had to create a “hide” feature in your feed so you could hide away friends that you don’t like without actually having the unfriend them.  That’s silly.

One of the primary ways that you find other interesting people to follow on Twitter is through the Following list belonging to the people that you already follow.  The assumption is, “If I am following you, you are probably following some people that I would find interesting.”  So you check out their list and follow some of them.  This is one of the primary ways that Twitter grows and spreads.

Now, if you put pressure on twitter users to follow those that follow them then you automatically begin decreasing the value and authenticity of their list of followed users.  It ceases to mean anything to them.  It ceases to mean anything to everyone.  Soon, Twitter will have to invent ways to unfollow people without actually unfollowing them just like Facebook has done.  Again, that’s silly.

Does anyone actually believe that a human being can keep up with more than 100 active people at a time on Twitter?  Sure.  Create your lists, Tweetdeck filters, and all that jazz.  Go ahead.  You still won’t follow that many people.  You will have the list that you follow that filters out the people you don’t care about, while everyone else gets relegated to a column off-screen somewhere. You’ve in effect unfollowed people without actually unfollowing them and now your “following” list means about as much as your Facebook “friends” list does right now.  Just a hair more than nothing.

Stop the madness.  Only follow people you care about and don’t follow more people than you can realistically keep up with.  Don’t be silly, and don’t succumb to the pressure to make social media socially shallow.  It doesn’t have to be, but it will be if you start following people that you could care less about.

Recently, several people I know have told me that they are quitting twitter, or have just stopped using it because the people they follow say annoying things.  This is a symptom of what I’m talking about here.

As for me, I will only follow people that interest me or that I know personally, offline.  If that means you won’t follow me, then so be it.  At least you will be able to look at who I am following and know that every person on that list has some significance to me.  You will also know that if I follow you, I will actually read what you say and not drop you in a filtered column of purgatory off -screen.  I currently follow a little over 200 people on twitter.  Only 75 – 100 of those are active at all.  Very few of the remaining ones tweet every day.

What are your thoughts?  Am I right on this one?

The Clap Offering

// September 9th, 2009 // 11 Comments » // Church Life, Humor

clappingI grew up in a church that did “modern” worship before it was cool. Granted, what we did wasn’t exactly Hillsongs United, but it did involve an overhead projector and a PA system. It was the 7-11 approach to worship music. 7 words, sung 11 times. Remember “I Exalt Thee”?

A lot of things have changed since then, but one thing has not.

The Clap Offering.

When the worship band finishes a song it never feels like it should end.  We never know quite what to do with our hands during that moment.  If we were attending a performance, we would clap for the band during that awkward dead air.  It’s what we do at rock shows.  We congratulate the band on a good performance by clapping.  Or, alternatively, we clap for the performers to make them feel better about a bad performance, as is the case at your daughter’s dance recitals.

But at church we aren’t supposed to be performing.  Yet, we feel this compulsion to clap.  We can’t help it.  We find ourselves clapping, then realize we can’t clap for the band so someone will shout “Let’s give a clap offering to the Lord! Hurray!”

Uhhh… whah?  I’m no Jesus, but I don’t know how impressed He’ll be by my sacrificial slapping of skin together.  Or does Jesus really appreciate a good clap?  Does it make Him feel better about Himself when I say, “Way to go, Jesus.  Nice job.”?

And, I’m confused.  What makes a good clap offering?  What’s the difference between one that may be “acceptible to the Lord only because of grace” and one that He really likes?  How would the apostle Paul clap?  Is there a clap offering technique to be practiced?  What if I do the cheerleader clap with both palms cupped and hitting together?

Do I get extra “points” for the over-the-head, rock-n-roll front man clap while bobbing my head?  What if I turn to the audience and start waving my hands up and down, palms up saying “give it up!  give it up!  A clap offering.  give it up!  give it up!”  I may not be clapping myself, but I am releasing others into their clap callings per Ephesians 4:11-12.

What about the slow, yet building faster and louder clap?  It’s more dramatic, does that make it better?  You can combine this one with a standing ovation and a knowing nod to your neighbors too.  Very versatile.

Or the famous golf clap?  It’s soft, yet respectful.

What if I lost both my palms in a terrible handball accident and all I can do is snap my fingers?  Is the “snap offering” a reasonable, if inferior, substitute for the clap offering?  They say that when you lose one sense, the others intensify.  I bet there are some palmless people out there that can really snap like the dickens.  Should they be excluded?

This gets really confusing when someone does a “special”.  Even if the special involves a mime, silver spandex, inflated gold balloons, and Twila Paris’ “God Is in Control”; we still feel the need to clap.  But now we are really confused because this seemed like more of a performance because everyone was sitting down and the mime is the pastor, but we still don’t think we are really allowed to clap for someone other than Jesus.  So we clap, but maybe we gaze up at heaven thoughtfully or season our clapping with a few “Amens” and “Hallelujahs” to perhaps deflect some of the clapping toward heaven nonetheless.

Or maybe it’s not the clap, but the heart behind the clap that matters.

Is Social Media a Fad?

// September 7th, 2009 // 3 Comments » // General, Video

If you know me at all, you know I don’t think so.  But why take my word for it?  Check out these stats.

The Most Interesting Man in the World

// May 24th, 2009 // No Comments » // Humor, Video

Love these commercials.  I laugh, but deep down I still want to be that guy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p2SSZA0CjdQ

Real Life Twitter – Hilarious Video

// May 3rd, 2009 // 3 Comments » // Humor, Video

I found this (ironically via @nathanrice on Twitter) and laughed out loud.  Enjoy, and if you’re a Twitter user like me don’t take yourself too seriously…  ;-)