<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Photo Processing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bencotten.net/2007/10/30/photo-processing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bencotten.net/2007/10/30/photo-processing/</link>
	<description>living life with eyes wide open</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 02:57:42 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Heather</title>
		<link>http://www.bencotten.net/2007/10/30/photo-processing/comment-page-1/#comment-808</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 03:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bencotten.net/2007/10/31/photo-processing/#comment-808</guid>
		<description>These are great to know.  I will def. be trying out Shutterfly since there have been so many good comments on them.  Thanks for all the input so far!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are great to know.  I will def. be trying out Shutterfly since there have been so many good comments on them.  Thanks for all the input so far!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jen</title>
		<link>http://www.bencotten.net/2007/10/30/photo-processing/comment-page-1/#comment-807</link>
		<dc:creator>jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 02:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bencotten.net/2007/10/31/photo-processing/#comment-807</guid>
		<description>Shutterfly it is, and I&#039;m a picky girl when it comes to my pictures!  Though I will be checking out photoworks after reading the above comment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shutterfly it is, and I&#8217;m a picky girl when it comes to my pictures!  Though I will be checking out photoworks after reading the above comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LeeAnn</title>
		<link>http://www.bencotten.net/2007/10/30/photo-processing/comment-page-1/#comment-805</link>
		<dc:creator>LeeAnn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 17:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bencotten.net/2007/10/31/photo-processing/#comment-805</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t printed many, but Sam&#039;s Club did a good job for me, plus I can send it to the Sam&#039;s Club by my parents.  My friends and family use Walgreen&#039;s and even the larger sizes that they framed look great!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t printed many, but Sam&#8217;s Club did a good job for me, plus I can send it to the Sam&#8217;s Club by my parents.  My friends and family use Walgreen&#8217;s and even the larger sizes that they framed look great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth</title>
		<link>http://www.bencotten.net/2007/10/30/photo-processing/comment-page-1/#comment-802</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 15:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bencotten.net/2007/10/31/photo-processing/#comment-802</guid>
		<description>I also vote for Shutterfly.  I don&#039;t get prints very often, so I wait until they send me a special offer for 20 free prints or something similar, then just pay a couple dollars shipping.  Sweet!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also vote for Shutterfly.  I don&#8217;t get prints very often, so I wait until they send me a special offer for 20 free prints or something similar, then just pay a couple dollars shipping.  Sweet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jessica</title>
		<link>http://www.bencotten.net/2007/10/30/photo-processing/comment-page-1/#comment-801</link>
		<dc:creator>jessica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 14:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bencotten.net/2007/10/31/photo-processing/#comment-801</guid>
		<description>I have used shutterfly for a while now and have only had one set of prints that I was unhappy with.  But, if you are unhappy with them, you can send them back and they will reprint them for you.  I actually have had better luck with them than anyone else.  And, if you do a prepaid plan, you can get the prints for .12 each. Hope this helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have used shutterfly for a while now and have only had one set of prints that I was unhappy with.  But, if you are unhappy with them, you can send them back and they will reprint them for you.  I actually have had better luck with them than anyone else.  And, if you do a prepaid plan, you can get the prints for .12 each. Hope this helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phyllis</title>
		<link>http://www.bencotten.net/2007/10/30/photo-processing/comment-page-1/#comment-764</link>
		<dc:creator>phyllis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 02:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bencotten.net/2007/10/31/photo-processing/#comment-764</guid>
		<description>i have tried a bunch of them. i generally don&#039;t like snapfish for printing digitals (they used to be great back when i used print film, though). i usually use shutterfly, which is good, but i recently sent a bunch of black and whites to be printed through photoworks and let me tell you, those were the best. the black and whites were so much crisper than anyone else&#039;s. plus, they can print in 3X5, which no one else can print, and they have the most creative card selection...i still use shutterfly for almost everything because i make photo books mostly instead of printing photos, but for framing, i&#039;m all about photoworks now! (anyone from photoworks out there reading? i&#039;ll take free stuff now....grin)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have tried a bunch of them. i generally don&#8217;t like snapfish for printing digitals (they used to be great back when i used print film, though). i usually use shutterfly, which is good, but i recently sent a bunch of black and whites to be printed through photoworks and let me tell you, those were the best. the black and whites were so much crisper than anyone else&#8217;s. plus, they can print in 3X5, which no one else can print, and they have the most creative card selection&#8230;i still use shutterfly for almost everything because i make photo books mostly instead of printing photos, but for framing, i&#8217;m all about photoworks now! (anyone from photoworks out there reading? i&#8217;ll take free stuff now&#8230;.grin)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather Cotten</title>
		<link>http://www.bencotten.net/2007/10/30/photo-processing/comment-page-1/#comment-762</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather Cotten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 23:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bencotten.net/2007/10/31/photo-processing/#comment-762</guid>
		<description>The Mac idea sounds awesome. I will be looking into that :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Mac idea sounds awesome. I will be looking into that :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
